Difference between revisions of "Main Page"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| − | 1. create SFU contract between DGr & JC | + | '''1. create SFU contract between DGr & JC |
2. collect prior MeatBook work | 2. collect prior MeatBook work | ||
| − | + | ''' | |
a) will be found on BOTH the large computer AND laptop; | a) will be found on BOTH the large computer AND laptop; | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| − | 3. literature review | + | '''3. literature review''' |
search for prior art related to meat. | search for prior art related to meat. | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
people passing it around (JC) | people passing it around (JC) | ||
| − | factor: rotting conceptual, | + | factor: rotting conceptual, |
| − | 4. place all the prior art, including images and text files (be sure to include citation info) in the MEATBOOK folder, | + | '''4. place all the prior art, including images and text files (be sure to include citation info) in the MEATBOOK folder, |
| − | in a subfolder titled PRIOR ART | + | in a subfolder titled PRIOR ART''' |
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
| − | 5. for talk in Stockholm, reshoot prototype (video) | + | '''5. for talk in Stockholm, reshoot prototype (video) |
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
| − | 7. create an archive of all info; put on a CDROM entitled MEATBOOK 2006 ARCHIVE | + | 7. create an archive of all info; put on a CDROM entitled MEATBOOK 2006 ARCHIVE''' |
test CD to make sure it will run on other computers | test CD to make sure it will run on other computers | ||
| Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
| − | 8. Here, let's discuss the conceptual issues. | + | '''8. Here, let's discuss the conceptual issues.''' |
(insert here) | (insert here) | ||
| Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
| − | 9. Technical issues: | + | '''9. Technical issues:''' |
decay, stink, legal preventatives, role of dead animal/carnivore/commodified predatorial behavior | decay, stink, legal preventatives, role of dead animal/carnivore/commodified predatorial behavior | ||
| − | preservatives | + | preservatives; |
| + | |||
| + | technical; degrading times (rubber, silicone, fingernail polish) poking thru, old people skin on bone during humid degrading | ||
Revision as of 22:50, 16 March 2006
Research: The MeatBook
1. create SFU contract between DGr & JC
2. collect prior MeatBook work
a) will be found on BOTH the large computer AND laptop;
b) other people's writing (start: Intelligent Agent, writing by Eugene Thacker, etc.)
please condense to one place (large computer)
create and place all of it in a folder titled MEATBOOK06
3. literature review
search for prior art related to meat.
Be sure to find:Jana Sterbak (Canadian), the (Italian?) guy who created a parquet floor comprised of cold cuts (in artbook that is inside inflated plastic pillow). plus Centre Pompidou (food exhibit?) guy had a steak on the wall that fell down the wall day by day
and visceral-provoking art (historical stuff by Francis Bacon, painter)
ALso be sure to find TALKS that include the video and include them in the archive.
[concept 1: "the abject" Julia Kristeva, threatening mortality, disturbs your body image; Gromala wants sustained visceral interaction] [concept 2: historically, art has been about representation not the thing itself; meatbook befuddles that notion, primary issue for interactive art; Tissue Culture work should ellicit a visceral response, but usually it doesn't or it is abject; familiarity let's users touch it] [concept 3: animism ]
WIRELESS: dropping on pedestal; people passing it around (JC)
factor: rotting conceptual,
4. place all the prior art, including images and text files (be sure to include citation info) in the MEATBOOK folder, in a subfolder titled PRIOR ART
5. for talk in Stockholm, reshoot prototype (video)
6. edit, debug, make sure it runs on Gromala's laptop
7. create an archive of all info; put on a CDROM entitled MEATBOOK 2006 ARCHIVE
test CD to make sure it will run on other computers
copy the CD
8. Here, let's discuss the conceptual issues.
(insert here)
phenomenology (Merleau-Ponty), Bataille (the wound; tears of eros); "visceral" (i.e., 2cd brain); pre-conscious reaction "reading" of quivvering meat
paradox of meat and text
teleological argument about text: it led to the dimunition of the senses since people no longer sit around a campfire in real-time, as a community (though I wonder how many communities didn't just resort to eating each other or raiding).
Thus, we are not nec. present in real-time; cannot see, smell, kinesthetically relate to gestures, share food. So senses are condensed to the visual (and sublingual, according to some who think that when we read we kind of move our tongue as if silently reading).
Humanistic argument (that I also challenged with the biomorphic typography).
paradox 2 is meat is dead but it quivers (animisim)
challenging the notion of representation we are not representing, the meatbook IS the thing, not a representation of something else (as text is)
9. Technical issues:
decay, stink, legal preventatives, role of dead animal/carnivore/commodified predatorial behavior
preservatives;
technical; degrading times (rubber, silicone, fingernail polish) poking thru, old people skin on bone during humid degrading
