Difference between revisions of "Main Page"
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
---------------- | ---------------- | ||
− | 1. SFU contract between DGr & JC | + | |
+ | 1. create SFU contract between DGr & JC | ||
+ | |||
2. collect prior MeatBook work | 2. collect prior MeatBook work | ||
− | + | ||
+ | will be found on BOTH the large computer AND laptop; | ||
+ | |||
+ | please condense to one place (large computer) | ||
+ | |||
+ | create and place all of it in a folder titled MEATBOOK06 | ||
---------------- | ---------------- | ||
+ | |||
3. literature review | 3. literature review | ||
Line 13: | Line 21: | ||
Be sure to find:Jana Sterbak (Canadian), the (Italian?) guy who created a parquet floor | Be sure to find:Jana Sterbak (Canadian), the (Italian?) guy who created a parquet floor | ||
comprised of cold cuts (in artbook that is inside inflated plastic pillow). | comprised of cold cuts (in artbook that is inside inflated plastic pillow). | ||
+ | |||
+ | ALso be sure to find TALKS that include the video and include them in the archive. | ||
+ | |||
4. place all the prior art, including images and text files (be sure to include citation info) in the MEATBOOK folder, | 4. place all the prior art, including images and text files (be sure to include citation info) in the MEATBOOK folder, | ||
Line 18: | Line 29: | ||
---------------- | ---------------- | ||
+ | |||
5. for talk in Stockholm, reshoot prototype (video) | 5. for talk in Stockholm, reshoot prototype (video) | ||
+ | |||
6. edit, debug, make sure it runs on Gromala's laptop | 6. edit, debug, make sure it runs on Gromala's laptop | ||
− | 7. create an archive of all info; put on a CDROM entitled MEATBOOK 2006 | + | |
+ | 7. create an archive of all info; put on a CDROM entitled MEATBOOK 2006 ARCHIVE | ||
+ | |||
+ | test CD to make sure it will run on other computers | ||
+ | |||
+ | copy the CD | ||
+ | |||
---------------- | ---------------- | ||
+ | |||
8. Here, let's discuss the conceptual issues. | 8. Here, let's discuss the conceptual issues. | ||
− | + | (insert here) | |
− | + | ||
+ | phenomenology (Merleau-Ponty), Bataille (the wound; tears of eros); "visceral" (i.e., 2cd brain); pre-conscious reaction "reading" of quivvering meat | ||
paradox of meat and text | paradox of meat and text | ||
Line 40: | Line 61: | ||
Humanistic argument (that I also challenged with the biomorphic typography). | Humanistic argument (that I also challenged with the biomorphic typography). | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | paradox 2 is meat is dead but it quivers (animisim) | ||
+ | |||
+ | challenging the notion of representation | ||
+ | we are not representing, the meatbook IS the thing, not a representation of something else (as text is) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | 9. Technical issues: | ||
+ | |||
+ | decay, stink, legal preventatives, role of dead animal/carnivore/commodified predatorial behavior | ||
+ | |||
+ | preservatives |
Revision as of 03:01, 12 March 2006
Research: The MeatBook
1. create SFU contract between DGr & JC
2. collect prior MeatBook work
will be found on BOTH the large computer AND laptop;
please condense to one place (large computer)
create and place all of it in a folder titled MEATBOOK06
3. literature review
search for prior art related to meat.
Be sure to find:Jana Sterbak (Canadian), the (Italian?) guy who created a parquet floor comprised of cold cuts (in artbook that is inside inflated plastic pillow).
ALso be sure to find TALKS that include the video and include them in the archive.
4. place all the prior art, including images and text files (be sure to include citation info) in the MEATBOOK folder,
in a subfolder titled PRIOR ART
5. for talk in Stockholm, reshoot prototype (video)
6. edit, debug, make sure it runs on Gromala's laptop
7. create an archive of all info; put on a CDROM entitled MEATBOOK 2006 ARCHIVE
test CD to make sure it will run on other computers
copy the CD
8. Here, let's discuss the conceptual issues.
(insert here)
phenomenology (Merleau-Ponty), Bataille (the wound; tears of eros); "visceral" (i.e., 2cd brain); pre-conscious reaction "reading" of quivvering meat
paradox of meat and text
teleological argument about text: it led to the dimunition of the senses since people no longer sit around a campfire in real-time, as a community (though I wonder how many communities didn't just resort to eating each other or raiding).
Thus, we are not nec. present in real-time; cannot see, smell, kinesthetically relate to gestures, share food. So senses are condensed to the visual (and sublingual, according to some who think that when we read we kind of move our tongue as if silently reading).
Humanistic argument (that I also challenged with the biomorphic typography).
paradox 2 is meat is dead but it quivers (animisim)
challenging the notion of representation we are not representing, the meatbook IS the thing, not a representation of something else (as text is)
9. Technical issues:
decay, stink, legal preventatives, role of dead animal/carnivore/commodified predatorial behavior
preservatives