|
|
| (35 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | '''Research: The MeatBook''' | + | '''To-Do List''' |
| − | | |
| − | ----------------
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | 1. create SFU contract between DGr & JC
| |
| − | | |
| − | 2. collect prior MeatBook work
| |
| − |
| |
| − | a) will be found on BOTH the large computer AND laptop;
| |
| − | | |
| − | b) other people's writing (start: Intelligent Agent, writing by Eugene Thacker, etc.)
| |
| − | | |
| − | please condense to one place (large computer)
| |
| − | | |
| − | create and place all of it in a folder titled MEATBOOK06
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | ----------------
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | 3. literature review
| |
| − | | |
| − | search for prior art related to meat.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Be sure to find:Jana Sterbak (Canadian), the (Italian?) guy who created a parquet floor
| |
| − | comprised of cold cuts (in artbook that is inside inflated plastic pillow).
| |
| − | | |
| − | ALso be sure to find TALKS that include the video and include them in the archive.
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | 4. place all the prior art, including images and text files (be sure to include citation info) in the MEATBOOK folder,
| |
| − | in a subfolder titled PRIOR ART
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | ----------------
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | 5. for talk in Stockholm, reshoot prototype (video)
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | 6. edit, debug, make sure it runs on Gromala's laptop
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | 7. create an archive of all info; put on a CDROM entitled MEATBOOK 2006 ARCHIVE
| |
| − | | |
| − | test CD to make sure it will run on other computers
| |
| − | | |
| − | copy the CD
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | ----------------
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | 8. Here, let's discuss the conceptual issues.
| |
| − | | |
| − | (insert here)
| |
| − | | |
| − | phenomenology (Merleau-Ponty), Bataille (the wound; tears of eros); "visceral" (i.e., 2cd brain); pre-conscious reaction "reading" of quivvering meat
| |
| − | | |
| − | paradox of meat and text
| |
| − | | |
| − | teleological argument about text: it led to the dimunition of the senses since people no longer sit around a campfire in real-time, as a community (though I wonder how many communities didn't just resort to eating each other or raiding).
| |
| − | | |
| − | Thus, we are not nec. present in real-time; cannot see, smell, kinesthetically relate to gestures, share food.
| |
| − | So senses are condensed to the visual (and sublingual, according to some who think that when we read we kind of move our tongue as if silently reading).
| |
| − | | |
| − | Humanistic argument (that I also challenged with the biomorphic typography).
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | paradox 2 is meat is dead but it quivers (animisim)
| |
| − | | |
| − | challenging the notion of representation
| |
| − | we are not representing, the meatbook IS the thing, not a representation of something else (as text is)
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | 9. Technical issues:
| |
| − | | |
| − | decay, stink, legal preventatives, role of dead animal/carnivore/commodified predatorial behavior
| |
| − | | |
| − | preservatives
| |
